I give you an example, for starters. It is very well known in my local group, and accepted, that I am a masochist and I have the ability to play very, very hard. This does not mean that each and every time I scene, it is what happens. However, there is an intensity, and a very clearly tangible undercurrent of possible risk, with most of what I do.
There are people who not only, do not understand my interests, but also because of their lack of education, feel it is acceptable to question my judgement and ability to be a responsible, risk-aware participant. Too, some of these same people offer forth the idea of segregating the more edgier kink, from that which is more often commonly accepted and practiced.
Who decides here? Who makes the judgement call as to what exactly constitutes a high-risk sort of play in which there should be a separate area needed? Exactly what is the point of allowing those people to stay within the safe and blessed comfort zone of that which I like to call ignorance? We profess to have tolerance, understanding, and acceptance as a community. I do not believe being divided amongst ourselves with the thoughts of "My kink is OK, but yours is so very wrong" is conducive to growth or development.
As responsible adults, we are capable of choice. As aware adults, we accept and recognise the choices of others. As kinksters, lifestylers, and players, we respect choice as being inherent for all involvement in BDSM.
I am not going to hide my kink behind a screen.


1 comments:
puppy such is the pitfalls of orangized society what ever society it may be. It is the need (I think) of the collective that there has to be structure ( not to be constructed with lovely control )with out sturcture there is chaose so in their mind set they have to do the structure and come up with rules and regulations to be governed by and insituted. Oh to just live in the Northwoods away from it all if one can get away from it all.
Post a Comment